Jan. 8th, 2004

herewiss13: (Default)
I've been revisiting the "Foreigner" hexology recently and have come to two conclusions.

Quite often, over the course of the entire book, nothing happens. "Defender" is a good example. Bren discovers he's going on a long trip and spends the rest of the book being confused about it. There are things happening (aka Ramirez), but they aren't the plot. They're the set-up to plot. They raise issues, they aren't issues in and of themselves.

So we get 200 pages of Bren running around like a chicken with its head cut off, talking with everyone, trying to figure out what's going on, coping with a needy mother, brother and wannabe fiance by patchy email...then Ilisidi invites the Captain to an eventful dinner party and boom; there's your climax, all in about 30 pages. The resolution? I'm not sure. Sabin may respect Ilisidi a bit more, but even that is shaky.

Mind you, I love these books. The culture, the translations, the attempts to explain one set of customs to the owners of another...no one does it better. But you've got to call a spade a spade and there's not a lot of meat here.

The second, and more objectionable, observation is that Cherryh isn't very nice to her human villians. They tend to be stubborn, paranoid, rude and stupid. And Obstinant, because "stubborn" just can't cover it alone. It's as if the very idea of "opposing viewpoint" refuses to penetrate their skulls. They're all morons, more to the point, they're all the same moron and I wish Cherryh would give them a bit more intelligence and individuality, rather than using them merely to highlight how very reasonable and equitable Bren's goals are. The rudeness and bluntness of the "I Hate Bren" club just seems too overblown.

Idlewild

Jan. 8th, 2004 03:04 pm
herewiss13: (Default)
Read "Idlewild" the debut book by Nick Sagan (yes, relation) last night in one gulp. Part of this was good writing, part of it was insomnia and part of it was the realization that, being a shortish novel, I actually could.

On the back, there's a blurb by Neil Gaiman saying "...starts out like Amber meets The Matrix, and as it goes along, it turns into several something elses..."

It actually doesn't...mostly. It stays "Amber meets The Matrix" pretty much all the way through. There are, however, also definite resonances to:

Steel Beach by John Varley
True Names by Vernor Vinge
12 Monkeys (starring Brad Pitt)

and stylistic notes along the lines of a Heinlein Juvenille meets Stephen King (for his kind of suspense, not gore).

I'm not sure how much that actually tells you about the book, but in retrospect I've just covered a good 95% of the plot and tone.

How many different works does something need to resonate with before it ceases to be an homage? I don't think "Idlewild" is an homage, but I do think it's a pretty clunky pastiche, lifting big obvious chunks of plot idea from various sources and mooshing them together. The gestalt may work, but the underlying sources blaze through and the seams stand out.

By all this I mean to say, it's not a bad book, but the blurbs et. al. would make it seem a much finer work than it is.

Profile

herewiss13: (Default)
herewiss13

April 2011

S M T W T F S
     12
3456 789
10111213141516
1718 1920212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 21st, 2026 11:00 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios